Barn Burning vs a Rose for Emily - 1083 Words

In Barn Burning, and A Rose for Emily William Faulkner creates two characters that are strikingly similar. Abner Snopes is loud and obnoxious. Because of this, most people tend to avoid him at all costs. On the contrary, Emily Grierson, a very intriguing woman from Jefferson, Mississipi, is an important figure in the town, despite spending most of her life alone. If these characters were judged purely on their reputation and physical appearance, it would be clear that Abner Snopes and Emily Grierson are opposites. Although at first look both Miss Emily and Abner Snopes appear different, they have more similar qualities than one would expect. These qualities drive them into a very similar and sad lifestyle. To analyze Abner Snopes†¦show more content†¦The most dramatic example of Abners need for this type of independence is when he burns down barns of those he does not agree with. He burns others property because he wants to show them that he is in control. He does this many times, moving to a new town to start over and always leaving a fiery trail behind him. He is so used to this vicious circle that it has even become a ritual. Emily and Abner display their independent and dominating personalities in all of their actions. William Faulkner’s style of writing evokes sympathy for his characters, regardless of how horrible the actions they committed were. The point of view in which he wrote the story determines how the story was told. Emilys version of the events would be quite different from someone elses version. Any person in the town would tell the story from his own experiences with Emily and his own attitudes toward her. By choosing a narrator who is not a part of the town, Faulker is able to achieve several things. He characterizes the town in addition to developing Emilys character. The town itself becomes a character in the story. By using the objective narrator, Faulkner is able to maintain the suspense of the story. The reader doesnt learn the story all at once because the narrator did not learn it that way. Faulkners narrator tells the story in a disjointed way, not in chronological order. He gives the reader clues, out of order. As the reader starts putting the clues together, a growing senseShow MoreRelatedâ€Å"a Rose for Emily† vs. â€Å"Barn Burning†2378 Words   |  10 PagesAmericas greatest authors. In fact, his short stories, Barn Burning, and A Rose for Emily, are two of the best-known stories in American literature. Both are examples of the reflection of contemporary Southern American values in his work. â€Å"Barn Burning† and â€Å"A Rose for Emily† are two stories both written by William Faulkner. â€Å"Barn Burning† has a theme of family loyalty verses loyalty to the law. â€Å"A Rose for Emily† has a theme of power by death. Emily is thought of as a monument, but at the same timeRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 PagesJuggernaut Starbucks: A Paragon of Growth and Employee Benefits Finds Storms Boston Beer: Is Greater Growth Possible? 29 46 PART II MARKETING WARS 61 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Cola Wars: Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi PC Wars: Hewlett-Packard vs. Dell Airliner Wars: Boeing vs. Airbus; and Recent Outsourcing Woes 63 86 PART III COMEBACKS Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 McDonald’s: Rebirth Through Moderation Harley-Davidson: Creating An Enduring Mystique Continental Airlines:Read MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pages.............................................................................. 299 CHAPTER 10 Deductive Reasoning .......................................................................................... 312 x Implying with Certainty vs. with Probability ................................................................................ 312 Distinguishing Deduction from Induction ..................................................................................... 319 Review of Major